The Modern Theory of the Sun:
At the beginning of the 20th century, physicists were just beginning to
understand matter. Thompson discovered the electron in 1897 [1,
2].
Planck quantized physics in 1900 [3, 4,
5]
and Bohr presented his quantized theory of the atom in 1911
[6].
The laws of thermodynamics, which would form the basis of solar theory,
were in the process of being formulated. Even at the close of the
19th century, Planck was still advocating the irreversibility which is now at the center of the 2nd law of thermodynamics (See The
Little Heat Engine). The 3rd law of thermodynamics,
which set absolute zero, did not yet exist. The same can be said
about the 0th law (See The
Little Heat Engine). Little was really known about the
fundamental internal differences between solids, liquids and gases.
The fathers of thermodynamics, men like Carnot, Kirchhoff, Gibbs, Claussius, Wein
and Stephan, had performed much of their work in the 18th and 19th
centuries. In order to analyze thermodynamic problems, they built
their ideas on the fact that only the "thermodynamic system"
as a whole was important. The internal processes within the system
were viewed as inconsequential. Of course, these pioneers had no
way of seeing the internal processes. As such, it was perhaps
logical for them to assume that these processes were unimportant.
The legacy of such men has been longstanding, and classical thermodynamics is
still taught with a "systems approach" which for the most part
ignores internal processes.
It was under such influences, that Lane [7], first published his
discussion of the gaseous nature of the sun. At the time of
course, Lane could have had little idea about whether or not the sun was
a gas or a liquid. However, the mass of the sun (1.9891 X1030
kg) was known, as was its diameter (1,392,530 km).
In 1926, Sir A. S. Eddington [8, 9] would build on the ideas of Lane
[7]. Eddington believed that the laws of physics and
thermodynamics could be used to deduce the internal structure of the sun
without any experimental verification [8, 9]. He would speak
hypothetically about being able to live on an isolated planet completely
surrounded by clouds. In such a setting, he thought he would still
be able to analyze the sun without any further knowledge than its mass,
its size and the laws of physics [8, 9]. It was in this
spirit that Eddington set out to expand on Lane's model of the sun.
Assuming that Lane's gaseous model was correct [7], Eddington used
simple deductive reasoning to set the internal temperature of the sun at
10,000,000 - 40,000,000 K [8, 9]. Today, this remains the range
for the internal temperature of the sun (roughly ~15,000,000 K).
This accepted temperature is reinforced by man's knowledge of the
temperatures associated with thermonuclear energy.
In 1926, Eddington realized that a gaseous sun should collapse on itself
[8, 9]. That is, the great forces of gravity present on the sun
should pull all of the mass of the sun into a much smaller sphere.
Eddington pondered how it was that the gaseous sun did not collapse.
He solved the problem by invoking outward radiation pressure originating
from within the sun. He reasoned that if the inside of the
sun was producing individual packets of light (or photons), that these
photons could in turn produce the outward pressure he was seeking.
It was already known that light pressure (or radiation pressure) could
be measured on earth. For instance, a thin foil of platinum could
be caused to rotate when exposed to light. Therefore, light quanta
clearly possessed momentum.
It was this "external light pressure" that Eddington would
invoke to keep the gaseous sun from collapsing on itself [8, 9].
Consequently, Eddington postulated that the inner portion of the sun
produced photons. He then deduced that these individual light
quanta would sooner or later run into a gas ion or atom and
propel it up against the sun's forces of gravity. He called
the region of the sun were this occurs the "radiation zone".
This zone remains a central portion of solar theory to this day.
Importantly however, there is no scientific evidence for this zone.
It exists only as a result of Eddington's reasoning.
Eddington believed that he properly understood a key aspect of solar
theory with the creation of the "radiation zone".
However, he wanted to know exactly how many photons the sun could
produce to support this hypothesis. At the time, he also
understood the consequences of Stephan's law of emission (see the essays
on The Little
Heat Engine and on Blackbody
Radiation).
Stephan's law of emission [10] states that the total amount of photons
(or light) emitted from a perfectly emitting object (a blackbody) is
directly proportional to the fourth power of the object's temperature (ε
= σT4
, where ε
represents total emission and Stephan’s constant, σ,
is equal to 5.67051 X 10-8 Watts/(m2K4)).
In Stephan's law of emission, Eddington saw his answer. Believing
that the internal layers of the sun could be treated as individual
blackbodies, Eddington could apply Stephan's law to internal solar
structures. He could construct hypothetical spheres within the sun
and calculate the total amount of photons emitted from such spheres.
Given the dimensions and temperatures involved, the total output
of photons would be almost unimaginable! Yet, Eddington believed
that Stephan's law was universally applicable. That is, he believe
that all objects follow Stephan's law in the limit that they are
blackbodies.
Eddington's application of Stephan's law would result in a
tremendous output of photons from the sun. Yet, the sun is known
to have a much lower total energy output.
At the same time, Eddington recognized from the laws of thermodynamics
that an object at millions of degrees should produce its photons at
X-ray frequencies. This was preordained by Stephan's law of
Emission [10], Wein's law of Displacement [11] and Planck's
blackbody radiation law [3]. However, Eddington also realized that
the sun emitted very little X-rays. Indeed, most of the solar
output of energy occurs in the so called "visible region".
That is, the sun is producing its energy primarily at frequencies easily
detected with the human eye. This energy output is known to
originate from an outer layer of the sun, called the
"photosphere".
In the mid 1880's, it was Langley [12, 13] who first recorded the output
energy of the photosphere. He thus pointed a detector directly at
the sun, and recorded, for the first time, its emission spectrum. At the
time that Langley obtained this emission spectrum of the sun he also
sought to analyze it. Langley immediately recognized that the
solar spectrum had a thermal appearance (see The
Little Heat Engine and Blackbody
Radiation essays). As such, Langley would seek to apply the
laws of thermal radiation to the analysis of the solar spectrum.
First, he assumed that the sun was nearly a blackbody. Consequently,
and based on Kirchhoff's law of emission, he was able to set the
temperature of the photosphere. Without regard for the
phases of matter, he therefore reported a temperature of nearly ~6,000
K. As a result, even though the laws of thermal emission were
developed in solids, the value of ~6,000 K remains the accepted
temperature of the photosphere to this day.
It can be said that Langley's experiment was the beginning of a new age
for astronomy [12, 13]. For the first time, the emission spectrum
(plot of the intensity of light as a function of frequency) of a star
had been recorded.
When Eddington was working on his theory of the gaseous sun [8, 9], he
was well aware of Langley's temperature for the photosphere (~6,000 K).
Yet, Eddington had deduced that the internal portion of the sun was at
temperatures of millions of degrees. Furthermore, these photons
should be produced at X-ray frequencies. In order to solve this
dilemma, Eddington simply stated that when photons are produced in the
radiation zone, they are initially produced at X-ray frequencies [8, 9].
However, when these photons are absorbed in the collisions associated
with radiation pressure (see above), they slowly lose some of their
energy. In this manner, after millions of years, and many
collisions, the photons emerge from the sun's photosphere shifted to the
visible region. Only a very small fraction of the total photons
produced in the absorptive zone manage to escape at any time.
Thus, the radiation zone is acting as a very slowly leaking
"sieve" [8, 9].
It was in this manner that Eddington was able to solve some of the great
problems in solar theory. First, how to prevent the gaseous sun
from collapsing on itself? Second, how to set the internal
temperature of the sun? And finally, how to shift the frequency of
photons produced at X-ray frequencies to the observed visible region?
The creation of the radiation zone had resulted in tremendous radiation
pressure within the sun. For Eddington, this radiative pressure
exactly balanced with the gravitational forces resulting in our current
gaseous model of the sun. The gaseous sun had been prevented from
collapsing and photons were now produced appropriately in the visible
range [8, 9].
It can be argued even today that much of modern solar theory can be
attributed to ideas first developed near the beginning of the 20th
century by men like Lane [7], Langley [12, 13] and Eddington [8,
9]. Little of significance has changed relative to solar theory
since 1926 [8, 9].
Today, Eddington’s radiation zone remains as a central feature of
solar theory. The sun is viewed as composed of a very hot internal
fraction (>10,000,000 K) surrounded by Langley’s photosphere at
~6,000 K (See Fig. 1). The density of the central core is
thought to approach 90 g/cm3, while that of the lower
photosphere is thought to be on the order of 10-7 g/cm3
[14]. Neither of the numbers of course can be verified by direct
experiment.
In addition, the primary means of heat transfer within the sun, as
proposed by Eddington, remains radiative in nature [8, 9]. That
is, photons become the primary means of achieving internal thermal
equilibrium in the sun (see essay on The
Little Heat Engine). The fact that for Eddington radiative
heat transfer becomes a dominant means of achieving internal thermal
equilibrium is not in accordance with our knowledge of the behavior of
objects (see essay on The
Little Heat Engine). Rather, for all other objects internal
thermal equilibrium is achieved through thermal conduction and
convection. In contrast, radiative heat transfer enables an object
to equilibrate with the outside world.
Thus, Eddington saw most of the sun as gaseous and at very high
temperatures (millions of degrees). Yet, this extremely hot
object, was surrounded by a very cool photosphere only a few thousand
kilometers thick and at a temperature of just ~6,000 K. It is
interesting that in Eddington's model, the inside of the sun is unable
to heat the photosphere. If the sun was a tennis ball, the entire
ball would be sitting at millions of degrees. Furthermore, it
would be surrounded by a layer, thinner than skin, at ~6,000 K.
How can the photosphere be so cold relative to the inside of the sun?
It is hard to conceive that such an object can really exist.
The next big step in solar theory came in the 1950's. At that
time, scientists were beginning to obtain interesting data from the
solar corona (the outer gaseous layer of the sun that is seen during
eclipses). The corona extends from the chromosphere (the layer
just above the photosphere) to millions of kilometers away from the sun.
Soon, it was observed that the corona possessed within it highly ionized
ions which can only be produced at temperatures well in excess of
1,000,000 K [15]. (The width of Lymanα
lines further demonstrates that temperatures in the corona range from
2.6 x106 K at 1.5 solar radius to 1.2 x106 K at 4
solar radii [15]).
This finding of very hot temperatures in the corona presented a major
problem for solar theory. Thus, a temperature within the corona
(>1,000,000 K) which exceeded that of the photosphere (~6,000 K)
indicated a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
That is, heat could not be coming from inside the sun to heat the corona
while remaining incapable of heating the photosphere. Thus, if the
photosphere was really at ~6,000 K, there must be found an alternative
means to heat the corona. It has now been widely accepted that the local
heating in the corona occurs as a result of a process involving the flow
of ions through the magnetic fields of the sun.
Thus, our modern model of the sun must generate enough internal
radiation pressure to prevent a gaseous sun from collapsing on itself.
The model must also contain photons. It must also shift the
photons produced at X-ray frequencies to the visible region.
Furthermore, in order to simultaneously preserve Langley’s temperature
and respect the 2nd law of thermodynamics, the model must
provide two means of generating heat! The first of these must occur
within the sun and is thought to be thermonuclear in origin. The second
must occur in the corona and is thought to be of magnetic origin.
Particles moving at enormous speeds must also be involved to ensure this
second temperature. Furthermore, something very strange must be
happening relative to the photosphere. Indeed, the model advances that
this layer cannot be heated either by the interior of the sun or by the
corona, both of which are at much higher temperatures.
It is under this backdrop that the modern theory of the sun has
developed and few if any have questioned the initial findings or
assumptions.
The
Liquid Photosphere:
The photosphere cannot be a gas. Gases simply cannot produce a Planckian
shaped emission profile (See The
Little Heat Engine and Photosphere
Poster). This is reserved for solids and liquids. At the
same time, the photosphere cannot be a solid as convection currents are
clearly observed in this layer. That is, there is clearly the flow
of material in the photosphere. This leaves the liquid state as a
prime candidate for the photosphere.
The sun has a total density of 1.4 g/cm3. This fact can
easily support a liquid model. By comparison, the density of water
is 1 g/cm3. In addition, a liquid structure eliminates
the need for radiation pressure to prevent the sun from collapsing on
itself through the forces of gravity. The liquid alone can support the
upper layers.
It is reasonable to postulate that a liquid is able to generate a
Planckian emission spectrum. It was seen in the essay on The
Little Heat Engine that a liquid still possesses the vibrational degrees
of freedom required for generating a Planckian emission profile.
In The
Little Heat Engine it has been discussed that the temperature which is reported by a
Planckian emission profile depends only on the amount of energy
contained in the vibrational degrees of freedom, Evib.
However, in a liquid, not all of the energy is contained within the
vibrational degrees of freedom (Evib). Indeed, most of
the energy (non-nuclear) may well be contained in the translational and
rotational degrees of freedom (Etrans). This leaves much less
energy than expected at a given temperature in the vibrational degrees
of freedom. This fact causes a liquid to report a much lower
temperature than its real temperature when Planck's, Wein's or Stephan's
laws are utilized to monitor its emission spectrum.
Since the frequency and amount of photons released by an object is
related only to the amount of energy in the vibrational degrees of
freedom Evib , it is easy to see why Langley was tricked into
thinking that the photosphere was sitting at a temperature of only
~6,000 K. A liquid , instantaneously lowers the total output
of photons at a given temperature and releases them at a frequency
significantly lower than what would be predicted from the real
temperature of the liquid. Thus, a liquid photosphere with a
temperature of ~7,000,000 degrees could be generating photons not at
X-ray frequencies as expected, but rather, in the visible range.
This occurs because the photosphere is a liquid and has convection.
Since most of the energy of the photosphere is tied up in the
translational (or rotational) degrees of freedom and its associated convection, it is
simply not available for the generation of photons. As such, the
photosphere is "tricking us". It is really much higher
in temperature than it appears.
Thus, the emissivity reflected in a liquid is not related directly to
temperature (See The
Little Heat Engine). Since an "apparent temperature"
is probably involved, Stephan’s [10], Wein’s [11] and
Planck’s [3] laws simply need to be modified. In these
equations, there is a temperature term (T), included. In
order to apply these equations properly to a liquid, the temperature (T)
term in these equations needs to be changed to an "apparent
temperature", Tapp. If this is done,
everything will still work. However, the apparent
temperature will not be a real temperature. Rather, the apparent
temperature, Tapp, is simply the real temperature, T, divided
by a constant "alpha" (Tapp=T/alpha). The constant alpha
would be temperature dependent for most liquids. For the
photosphere alpha
is ~1,000. As such, the sun's photosphere is reporting a
temperature which is nearly 1,000 times too low. Thus, there is
nearly 1,000 times more energy tide up into the translational degrees of
freedom of the photosphere than in the vibrational degrees of freedom.
That is where the "trick" comes in and this is where Langley
was fooled!
The liquid phase could account for the tremendous convection currents
found on the solar surface by invoking the translational and rotational degrees of
freedom to deal with the heat separating the real temperature
"T" and the apparent temperature "Tapp". The liquid
phase is likely to provide the only means of producing a blackbody
radiation curve for the sun at a lower apparent temperature than its
real temperature. This remedies the problem with Langley’s temperature
for the photosphere. Placing a real temperature of the photosphere at
~7,000,000 K eliminates the need to find exotic ways of heating the
corona and permits the free flow of heat throughout the outer layers of
the sun. As such, the 2nd law of thermodynamics is no longer
violated. Photons no longer take millions of years to leave the sun, but
rather, are "instantly" released.
By invoking a liquid model with a shifted apparent temperature, the
"radiation zone" is no longer required within the sun. This is
because the massive amount of X-rays predicted by Eddington's
application of Stephan’s law would never be produced. The second law
of thermodynamics is no longer violated, since the photosphere is only
reporting a lower apparent temperature and not a real temperature. The
heating of the corona by complex magnetic field interactions is also no
longer required. The primary means of internal heat transfer within the
sun (like every other object known to man) once again becomes convection
and conduction. A theory based on the release of superheated liquid from
the convection zone could help explain much of the solar activity found
on the surface of the sun (including flares and prominences).
The liquid model for the photosphere is exceedingly simple. Moreover,
the photosphere has a reasonably distinct surface. This can only occur
when a liquid phase is invoked for the photosphere.
REFERENCES:
[1]
http://www.aip.org/history/electron/
[2]
http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/1906/index.html
[3].
Planck M., Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung in Normalspectrum.
Annalen der Physik. 1901; 4(3):553-563.
[4]
http://www.thermalphysics.org/planck/planck.html
[5]
http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/1918/index.html
[6]
http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/1922/index.html
[7].
Lane J.H., On the Theoretical Temperature of the Sun, under the
Hypothesis of a Gaseous Mass maintaining its Volume by its Internal
Heat, and Depanding on the Laws of Gases as known to Terrestrial
Experiments. Am. J. Sci. Arts, Series2, 4, 57.
[8].
Eddington A.S., The Internal Constitution of the Stars (Dover Edition).
Dover Publications, Inc. New York, 1959.
[9].
Eddington, A.S., Stars and Atoms, Yale University Press, New Haven,
1927.
[10].
Stefan, J. Ueber die Beziehung zwischen der Warmestrahlung und der
Temperatur. Wein. Akad. Sitzber. 1879; 79:391-428.
[11].
Wien W. Uber die Energieverteilung im Emissionspektrum eines schwarzen
Korpers. Annalen der Physik. 1896; 58:662-669.
[12].
Langley S. P. Experimental Determination of Wave-Lengths in the
Invisible Spectrum, Mem. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 147-162, 1883.
[13].
Langley S. P. On Hitherto Unrecognized Wave-lengths. Phil. Mag.
1886;22:149-173.
[14].
Gray, D.F., The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres.
Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, Cambridge, 1992,
p.124.
[15].
Livingston W and Koutchmy S. Eclipse Science Results: Past and Present.
ASP Conference Series, vol. 205, p. 3-10, 2000.
Published
electronically on June 23rd, 2001
Presented
in part at the American Physical Society Meeting Ohio Section May 2001
www.thermalphysics.org